1/ I practiced an inbox workflow with 8 synthetic emails: define classification rules, then review a table, reply drafts and a daily brief. This shares the practice method; a real inbox workflow remains unverified.

2/ The rules use 6 business labels plus Review for uncertainty. Missing context becomes a question; each email has one primary workflow label.

3/ There are 2 reply drafts. Unknown meeting times, prices and delivery dates stay pending for a person to decide.

4/ The sequence: calibrate samples → check real tools → small trial → acceptance → Skill → consider a Routine. Review each stage separately.

5/ This exercise measured no time savings or accuracy and wrote nothing to Gmail. Define inputs, outputs and exceptions before deciding whether to automate.

## LinkedIn

I used 8 synthetic emails to practice defining a clear deliverable.

The output is a classification table, 2 reply drafts and a daily brief. Six business labels plus Review retain emails with missing context.

Two checks matter: each judgment traces to its source email, and a draft never confirms an unknown time, price or delivery date.

Real Gmail tools, a small live trial and human acceptance still need checking before a Skill or Routine. No time savings or accuracy were measured, and no real inbox was written.

Which recurring deliverable would you define first?